|
MY MTDNA MATCHES THAT OF 'ALIX'S' REAL MOTHER, QUEEN ALEXANDRA OF ENGLAND.
For those of you who do not know the story of the disappearance of Tsar Nicholas and his family during the Russian Revolution
in 1918 I will start by identifying the principal characters.
Tsar Nicholas 2nd was the Emperor and spiritual Christian Orthodox leader of Russia. Because of his removal, by evil forces
in 1918, I believe that Russia has lost its spiritual compass. Russia therefor has been left to wander politically and spiritually,
like any other country, without the blessings and guidance of our Lord Jesus Christ. This has led Russia into chaos and the
wanton murder of its people by leaders like the madman and murderer Stalin. The re-establishment of the Romanov Tsarist throne
is necessary for the sanctification and healing of Russia and its people.
Tsar Nicholas's wife was the Tsarina Alexandra also known as 'Alix'. Their children were Olga, Tatiana, Maria, Anastasia,
and Alexie Nicholaevich Romanov.
Edward 7th,The Prince of Wales and Princess Alice were the son and daughter of Queen Victoria of England. Princess Alice,
historically, has been taken to be 'Alix's' mother. Edward and his wife the Princess of Wales (who later became Queen ) Alexandra
were very close to Princess Alice. My documentation proves without a doubt that 'Alix's' real mother was infact Queen Alexandra
of England, Tsar Nicholas 2nd's mother's sister. ' Alix ' was born on June 6th, 1872 while Alexandra was still the Princesss
of Wales.
The Princess of Wales Alexandra and Princess Alice were very close in-laws sharing many experiences together among which
was Edward's Typhoid illness when he was still the Prince of Wales. His sister, Princess Alice, was a free thinker and philosopher
whose sexual standards were in direct conflict with her mother Queen Victoria.
How Did The Princess of Wales Alexandra get to become 'Alix's' mother?
After the death of Alexander, the Princess of Wales Alexandra's son born in 1871 and died days later, Queen Victoria prohibited
Alexandra and her husband Edward, the Prince of Wales, from having any more children. While in a Typhoid induced delirium,
when Edward was ill with Typhoid fever in November of 1871, Edward accused his wife Alexandra of adultery. His accusation
was heard by the court in attendance and was devastating to his wife. Finding herself pregnant with his child and in direct
disobedience to Queen Victoria's edict not to have anymore children Princess Alice and her sister-in-law Princess of Wales
Alexandra hatched up a scheme which would require Princess Alice to claim the child hers after it was born to Alexandra in
June of 1872, while Alexandra and her husband Edward were conveniently on vacation at a Roman hotel. Present with them were
Alexandra's parents, sisters and Waldemar her brother. Alice may have been there to receive the child or it was brought to
her at Darmstadt, Germany, where she lived with her husband Grand Duke Ludwig 4th of Hesse Darmstadt.
The Russian and British Governments did not know these facts when they provided Professor Ivanov and Dr. Gill with the
wrong samples. Since these authorities did not possess the true Romanov remains the samples they were providing these scientists
with would lead them through Prince Philip to his ancestor Princess Alice. This would be the 'expected' result because Princess
Alice was the historically 'known' ancestor of Empress Alexandra. They were wrong and my documentation proves it.
Why would these governments commit such a deception?
I believe the political climate in the early 1990's, when Communism was at its weakest point, the British government along
with President Yeltsin's desire for Democracy in Russia combined to change andat the same time unite Russia under a democratic
form of government. In order to do this effectively the 'Romanov' Tsarist hope of the Orthodox Church and the Monarchists
had to be silenced. Thus faking the samples would achieve this because the said authorities did not have the true Romanov
remains in their possession. I will add to this later.
My DNA and my family's DNA study was performed more than once and by different reputable organizations.
The first study was made by the Forensic Science Service of the British Home office. Dr. Gill's team concluded that hypervariable
region one ( HVR1) matched that of Russian Tsar Nicholas 2nd's maternal line. The evaluation of the profile concluded that
because I had a 'C' at position 16169 matching that of Kulikovsky, Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovich's son, that my relationship
to Tsar Nicholas 2nd was 'much closer' than that of the Duke of Fife and other relatives who had a 'T' at that same position.
A 'closer relationship' could only possibly come from Tsar Nicholas 2nd's own daughters namely Anastasia Nicholaevna or her
sister Olga Nicholaevna Romanov or Tatiana or Marie. From the excellent photographs I have posted on this web site I believe
that my maternal and paternal grandmothers were Josephine ( Anastasia ), and Concetta ( Olga ) respectively.
The other two organizations were the US Department of Defense under Dr. Parsons's direction and Dr. Terry Melton of Mytotyping
Technologies, Penn State Univerity, PA.
Dr. Melton studied Hypervariable region one and two. She concluded the study to be 'inconclusive' with a 'C' at position
195 of HVR2. The study was inconclusive because there exists people who have a more perfect DNA connection and are not related
at all to Tsar Nicholas 2nd. Nevertheless the difference at position 195 is acceptable since differences do occur within families.
Case in point the Duke of Fife with a 'T' at 16169 and Kulikovsky with a 'C' at 16169. Their match would be termed 'inconclusive'
also and yet we know they are indeed related to each other.
Dr. Parsons, from the US Department of Defense, included the study of my family's genetic analysis along with his study
of ancient DNA and the possible mutations which might occur within families which can trace their history for hundreds of
years. The Romanovs are certainly such a family.
The mutations exhibited within the Tsar's own immediate family begins with Queen Victoria's 'mysterious' Hemophiliac'
gene. It is mysterious because it seemed to have originated within herself since there has been no trace of it in her ancestors
before her. Next you have Tsar Nicholas himself and his brother Georgie and their 'heteroplasmy' exhibited in position 16169
of HVR1. Then we have the affor mentioned Kulikovsky and The Duke of Fife who also differ at position 16169. These are very
close relations and yet genetically different.
When, in light of the above discussion, we look at my MtDNA and consider Position 195 of HVR2 which has a 'C' whereas
Tsar Nicholas has a 'T' how sure are we that Queen Alexandra, his maternal aunt or his own mother Empress Marie didn't differ
with him and had a 'C' at this position as I do?
In conclusion then my 'C' at position 195 of HVR 2, even though termed 'inconclusive' a match with Tsar Nicholas 2nd,
does not exclude me as a direct relation to him through his daughters Anastasia, my maternal grandmother, who most likely
also had a 'C' at position 195, as could have Olga, my paternal grandmother. Please bear in mind that Queen Alexandra and
Alix, I believe, were mother and daughter. This would cause Tsar Nicholas and Alix, his wife, to have the same MtDNA since
his mother and Queen Alexandra were sisters. Since my MtDNA matches Nicholas II, it therefor matches his wife Alix through
her daughter Anastasia (my grandmother Josephine) originating from Alix's mother Queen Alexandra.
I hope I haven't confused everyone. It is realy quite simple! I hope someday I will have enough means by which I can present
all this to the world court or maybe those governments responsible for telling the truth on this issue will do just that,
finally, and restore my family members to their rightful place in history.
|