Blind World Magazine

Codes on Sites 'Captcha' Anger of Web Users.




The Wall Street Journal.
Wednesday, May 31, 2006.




Dave Simmer is a computer-savvy graphic designer. Yet when he surfs the Internet, he often gets stumped by the distorted jumbles of letters and numbers that some Web sites ask users to retype to gain access.


"They keep warping them and making them longer," says the 40-year-old from Cashmere, Wash.


The visually impaired have long decried these codes, which protect sites such as Yahoo.com and Ticketmaster.com from computer programs that create scores of email accounts for spammers or buy hundreds of concert tickets for scalpers. Now, the quizzes are irritating a wider array of Web surfers as companies toughen them as part of their arms race with the spam crowd.


The codes, called captchas, are also showing up more often amid a boom in new Web services, ranging from blogging tools to social-networking sites. The trickiest ones "make you not want to go to those sites anymore," says Scott Reynolds, a 29-year-old software architect in Ocala, Fla., who lambasted the devices on his blog last year.


The captchas' flaws are prompting academics, independent computer programmers and some Web companies to craft new variations that they hope will be easier for humans to decipher but harder for computer programs. The World Wide Web Consortium, an international group that encourages improved standards for Web programming, published a paper last November that advocates the creation of alternatives, saying the tests "fail to properly recognize users with disabilities as human" and are vulnerable to defeat by astute programmers.


Internet companies defend their use of the codes, saying they face a difficult balancing act of trying to fend off attackers while providing a good experience for users. "We know there's no perfect panacea, but we think this is a great tool to prevent malicious activity," says David Jeske, an engineering director at Google Inc. Google uses captchas for its free email service and its blog-writing service, among others. It is among companies that recently added an audio version, which lets the visually impaired listen to a series of letters or numbers and type them into their computer.


Some captchas have been solved with more than 90% accuracy by scientists specializing in computer vision research at the University of California, Berkeley, and elsewhere. Hobbyists also regularly write code to solve captchas on commercial sites with a high degree of accuracy.


But several Internet companies say their captchas appeared to be highly effective at thwarting spammers. "Researchers are really good, and the attackers really are not," says Mr. Jeske of Google, based in Mountain View, Calif. "Having these methods in place we find extremely effective against automated malicious attackers."


Ticketmaster, a unit of IAC/Interactive Corp., has altered its captchas over the years in response to automated computer programs, called "bots," that have cracked certain codes, says Brian Pike, Ticketmaster's chief technology officer. He says the robust resale market for tickets gives people a high incentive to try to swiftly snare tickets on its site.


Spam companies sometimes get around the challenge of captchas by hiring workers to fill out the forms for them instead of relying on bots, according to the World Wide Web Consortium. The group said in its paper last year that "it is a logical fallacy...to hail captcha as a spam-busting panacea."


Captcha is an acronym for Completely Automated Public Turing Test to Tell Computers and Humans Apart. Computer scientists at Carnegie Mellon University coined the term in 2000 to describe codes they created to help Internet giant Yahoo Inc. thwart a spam problem. "Turing" refers to Alan Turing, a mathematician famous for his codebreaking work during World War II and, later, as a pioneer in artificial intelligence. In 1950, Turing wrote a paper that proposed a test in which a person in one room would ask questions of both a human and a computer in another to try to determine which of the respondents was human. If the judge couldn't tell which was which, the computer could be said to be able to think.


Captchas deployed by commercial Web sites vary widely. For example, Microsoft Corp.'s Hotmail email service requires registrants to read a long series of twisted letters or numbers, obscured by several lines of varying shape. In contrast, eBay Inc.'s PayPal payment service shows simple block-style letters or numbers against a grid. Other sites use complex multicolored backgrounds.


Mr. Reynolds, the Florida software architect, says he has been confused by captchas shown by everyone from Microsoft to Apple Computer Inc. "The ones they make hard for a computer bot to break are also really hard for us to read," he says. "It kind of defeats the purpose."


Henry Baird, a professor of computer science at Lehigh University who studies PC users' responses to the codes, has been working with colleagues to develop new generations of captchas that are designed to be easier on humans but baffling for computers. One, called "scattertype," shatters each letter shown to users into pieces.


Some Internet companies have changed their captchas to make them simpler for users. Digg.com, a news Web site, changed the background to gray from multicolored earlier this year and now allows users to type in either capital or lower-case versions of the letters, says Steve Williams, a computer programmer for the company.


The difficulty of deciphering the visual codes is prompting even those who don't have a vision problem to begin clicking audio captchas whenever sites make them available. A growing number of sites, including Hotmail.com and PayPal.com, offer audio captchas. Google added it for its email service in March and for its blogging and Google Groups service in April. (Alternatively, some Web sites urge users having trouble to call a phone number for customer service or send an email to the company.)


The World Wide Web Consortium is urging programmers to devise viable alternatives to visual captchas because they affect people with a wide range of disabilities, including people with dyslexia and short-term memory problems, says Judy Brewer, director of the group's Web Accessibility Initiative, who is based in Cambridge, Mass. Captchas, "in their current form, are a misnomer," she says. They "don't tell humans and computers apart; instead, they tell able-bodied humans and computers, along with disabled humans, apart."


Some Web sites and independent computer programmers have rolled out new types of captchas. They generally involve solving simple equations or answering simple questions and could be adapted for use by the blind, although they would still present problems for people with learning disabilities.


Write to David Kesmodel at david.kesmodel@wsj.com



http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB114903737427467003-3PcIDkGWz68uBPEBUbV8Yir9HK0_20060629.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top




End of article.



Any further reproduction or distribution of this article in a format other than a specialized format, may be an infringement of copyright.






Go to ...


Top of Page.

Previous Page.

List of Categories.

Home Page.





Blind World Website
Designed and Maintained by:
George Cassell
All Rights Reserved.



Copyright Notice
and Disclaimer.