A Double Basin Tidal Plant

To backup and give credence to my column demanding a longer lasting solution to California's ongoing electrical power shortages, and my suggestion of saving money & installing tidal power stations instead of the 1,303,315,200 gallon-per-year, water-wasting, natural-gas gulping and short-lived gas turbine power generators; I'd like to present the following:

Site: Derby Tidal Power Station

Capital cost of tidal power stations varies between $1- 3 million per MW of installed generation capacity, dependent on site requirements, design and electricity demand.
Tidal power stations require no raw material inputs using instead the energy available in daily tidal movements. Their 40 year plant overhaul interval and fully automatic operation minimize running costs.

Staffing Required:
Tidal and run of river power stations are designed for fully automatic operation with minimal operation and maintenance personnel. Up to 6 personnel on larger sites may be required.

Training:
No special training requirements for tidal power station operational personnel exist other than that adopted by the electricity generation industry.

Expertise:
Special expertise is required at the development phase of any tidal or run of river power station. TEA may by agreement transfer such expertise to third party organizations.

This power station is scheduled to start producing May.

Tidal Energy Australia developed a unique double-basin tidal power station design generating constantly with Zero emissions – a world first and over 450 kilometers of transmission lines.
Its unique design features include barrage and sluice gate engineering and possible use of a novel turbine generator configuration.
The double basin design allows up to 48 MW of continuous electricity generation from the tides per hour. The turbine - generator technology may provide substantial capital and civil costs reductions being physically smaller and more readily available than conventional turbines. Converter technology use assures that variable water flows can be harnessed, producing uniform power output whilst computer models match power production-demand up to 2020.

TEA is keen to further develop its turbine-generator technology which is applicable to other low head hydro schemes such as 'run of the river' applications. The units are relatively compact by comparison to conventional turbines, capital costs are likely to be reduced and require only simplified civil structures.

Thus technology transfer to other low head hydro electric opportunities is straight forward, whilst the potential for capital savings may turn marginally viable projects into viable commercial ventures.

The Tidal power station in France generates 240 MW of power, (almost the same as our High Desert Power Plant) while using no fuel and destroying nothing and costing very little to operate.

My point is this:
California's efforts at solving the problem are a sham. This whole thing is about money involving the state, deregulated power supplier and fuel suppliers -- result the public health and welfare is at risk. What is required is a solution for the future. I think Tidal power stations are the answer for California with its hundreds of miles of coastline.

Lets Move on To Solution #3